Holy Sashes
Commentary by Steve Yuhas
June 8, 2004
It
seems like every other week IÕm forced to pen an article dealing with the
stunts committed by gay activists in the name of the rainbow. This time
the stunt was the filling of Catholic churches with men and women, ostensibly
Catholic, who wore rainbow colored sashes as a symbol of their gayness for the
entire world, the clergy and fellow church-goers, to see with the hope of being
denied Holy Communion.
Far
be it from me to say who can and cannot receive the most sacred blessing in all
of Catholicism, a blessing used to consecrate life, marriage and bury the dead,
but I am qualified to speak to the inappropriate nature of the political
stunt.
CNN
was abuzz with talk as two men squared off over the controversy dealing with
the annual wearing of rainbow sashes by gays in major and small cities across
the nation last Sunday. Television crews were in full form in order to
catch the Catholic leaders of some of the largest diocese in America denying
Holy Communion to wearers of the rainbows.
I
suppose it would be na•ve to think that the television cameras simply decided,
ÒHey Ð letÕs go to St. PaulÕs Cathedral and film the Eucharist today.Ó
IÕm sure the press releases had something to do with it.
So
what is the most recent inappropriate action of gay activists?
Gay
Catholics who are so hell bent on making their Church the topic of talk shows
that they go out of their way to announce to their churches that they are gay
and then get upset when the Church actually follows her doctrine regarding
homosexuality.
DoesnÕt
hurt that the gays have the help of a media savvy press relations office at
their headquarters either Ð canÕt make a political statement without issuing a
media release in order to get television cameras to cover the event.
What
is the insane desire to wear a sash to church announcing your sexual
desires? For gays it seems that everything they own and everything they
are comes down to who wears the most rainbows. Rainbows on cars, rainbows
on sashes and rainbow flags where there used to be an American one seems to be
the rule. There was a time when gays insisted that they just wanted to be
left alone to live their lives, now they are wearing rainbow sashes to church
to make sure that everyone knows theyÕre gay. What is the point?
I
mean, have you ever seen a straight person wear a sash across their chest to
announce their straightness? What about people into bondage? Surely
the Church frowns on that type of sexual behavior Ð where are all the leather
sashes? I canÕt imagine what people into bestiality would wear to Church,
perhaps a leather sash as well, but theyÕd certainly need something to make
sure they were not confused with people simply into bondage? Oh, the confusion
over the sashes.
It
seems that the only people who have to put their private sexual proclivities
front and center, even in the most inappropriate of places (read: church) are
gay people. Why is that?
It
could be that the ÒweÕre here, weÕre queer, get used to itÉÓ mantra is working
and gays believe that everywhere is now the perfect place to announce their
sexuality. It might be that gay people are so bent on pushing their
sexuality down the throats of their neighbors and co-parishioners that they are
willing to do anything to get attention. Or, as I strongly suspect, it
could be that gay people just canÕt get beyond their sexuality into the things
that truly matter in life.
If
the sash wearing Catholics disagree so strongly with the Church over the fundamental
teachings which define homosexuality activity as a sin, why are they so
insistent to remain members? Surely they could find a church more in line
with the lifestyle that they enjoy Ð as a matter of fact the gay community
invented a ÒchurchÓ (the Metropolitan Community Church) that does exactly
that. It is a ÒchurchÓ that stands for nothing and makes no judgments on
behavior Ð exactly what the gay activists are looking for.
Why
put on a show for the media in order to make public the contempt you hold for
your own church? Nobody forces grown men and women to be Catholic, if it
is such a repressive institution Ð why not simply leave it?
The
part of this that really irks me is that these little stunts do little to
further the cause that these people claim so much to care about: namely,
equality. If gays are so concerned about everyday average people
accepting them and their partners into society, why pull stunts like showing up
in groups with television cameras in tow to make a mockery of the most
important religious rite in the Catholic Church?
Gay
people have gone from being silent to being too damn loud if you ask me.
It isnÕt enough that theyÕve forced a marriage debate into the mainstream of
society or that promiscuous sex and illicit drug use is rampant in the gay
community right? No, sir, now we need to be treated to a mockery of a
faith that over a billion people around the world embrace just because a few
gay people with a press release want to stir up trouble.
It
is amazing that there are gay people who still ask themselves why mainstream
America finds us so abhorrent. It is days and weeks like these where I
share the sentiment with people in America who ask themselves why gays have to
be so up front about whom they sleep with.
Most
Americans are fair minded and couldnÕt care less, but when gays force their
sexuality into the churches and other inappropriate places, it defeats the
whole purpose of asking people to just let us live our lives being left alone.
Gays
are running out of time before America finally says, enough is enough and a
true backlash against obnoxious gay activism begins. Until gays can show
respect for the religious people in our nation and the traditions that made our
country great, they ought to stop demanding that people tolerate those things
their religions find objectionable.
It
is time to end this vocal loathsome gay activism and just be who you are
without wearing your sexuality on your sleeve.