John Kerry's Promise
of a New Gay Military
Commentary by Steve Yuhas
July 27, 2004
On
April 30, 2004 John Kerry wrote an opinion column for publication in the gay
press. The purpose of the article was to join gays in ÒÉcelebrating Pride
in the LGBT community.Ó One of the most underreported and seemingly
ignored aspects of his statement is beginning to become an issue for men and
women serving in uniform Ð his promise to Òend the discriminatory policy of
"don't ask, don't tell.Ó
Suspiciously,
KerryÕs article appears on gay websites such as gay.com and planetout.com, but
does not appear on his official campaign website and all references to gay
pride have been deleted from the mainstream portion of his site. The
mainstream press has paid little attention to his promise that will undoubtedly
spark a fight of tremendous proportion.
Few
things get people in uniform worked up or politically active: issues dealing
with deployments and pay raises are the big ones, but one sleeping giant this
election cycle may very well be John KerryÕs promise to disband the DonÕt Ask,
DonÕt Tell policy enacted by the Clinton administration that deals with gays
serving in the military.
DonÕt
Ask, DonÕt Tell is a simple policy. It says that members of the military
services cannot be asked about their sexual orientation and that they cannot
tell others about what they do in the privacy of their bedrooms. People
in the military are taught from boot camp onward what the military policy is
and it has worked since being enacted in 1993.
Each
year we are treated to a barrage of news releases by gay organizations who
declare that the military is ÒfiringÓ gay members of the military because they
are found to be gay. Figures are not difficult to come by, but one thing
is certain Ð gays being discharged from the military are not being fired, they
are resigning in droves.
Take
Fiscal Year 2000 as an example. The ServicemanÕs Legal Defense Network
(SLDN) Ð a gay organization devoted to lifting the ban on gays serving openly
in the military Ð issued a press release saying that the Department of Defense
fired 1,212 people for simply Òbeing gay.Ó What was not reported by the
activists at SLDN is that of the 1,212 discharges in FY2000 only 106 of them
were discharged for engaging in Òhomosexual conductÓ where the remaining 1,106
were discharged because they walked into their commanding officerÕs office and
announced that they were gay Ð knowing full well that they would be discharged.
I
inquired of SLDN as to why they didnÕt release the truth in the figures that
87% of the people discharged from the military for being homosexual were not
fired, but actually resigned from the military and their response was
puzzling. Steve Ralls of the SLDN told me that there is no such thing as
a ÒvoluntaryÓ statement and that those who do go to their commanding officer to
announce they are gay do so under duress. Not true.
I
can tell you from personal experience that I know people who have used DonÕt
Ask, DonÕt Tell to get out of the military in order to cut short their
enlistment while still receiving benefits of active duty service.
Servicemembers discharged for homosexuality receive an honorable discharge and
maintain all benefits afforded to gay and straight servicemen and women who
actually complete their contract and serve honorably.
John
Kerry should be forced to explain his position on ending the policy of DonÕt
Ask, DonÕt Tell in a time where military organizations are concerned not only
with retention, but with recruitment. Many on the left and many gay
activists who demand full inclusion of openly gay people into the military have
not experienced life wearing a uniform and living in close quarters and
watching gay military porn doesnÕt count for service either.
Opponents
compare DonÕt Ask, DonÕt Tell to the integration of blacks into white units in
the 1950s. That argument is pure unadulterated gibberish as sexual
attraction to a squad bay full of naked men during boot camp and simply being
uncomfortable because a black or brown skinned person happens to share a shower
are completely different things.
Sexual
orientation is a behavior that has to be told in order to be known. Race
is an immutable characteristic Ð a black man canÕt help but be known as a black
man, but a gay man has to take the effort and initiative to tell people that he
is gay. People who donÕt see the difference are simply ignoring the
obvious.
Imagine
showing up for boot-camp months after John Kerry is elected and when the Drill
Instructor orders new recruits off the bus there is a kid wanting to prove a
point who shows up wearing a rainbow t-shirts and queerly marches across the
parade deck. Does John Kerry not believe that the men serving, living,
and showering with this flamboyant young man will not feel a certain degree of
discomfort? Will there be different showers for men attracted to men and
for men who think theyÕre women?
Serving
in the military as a homosexual is easy, many of us have done it, but there is
absolutely no reason to open the military up to flamboyant homosexuals who
would have their service serve as a political statement rather than service to
the nation.
DonÕt
Ask, DonÕt Tell is supported by President Bush and opposed by John Kerry.
The mainstream media should demand an explanation by the Democratic nominee as
to how he will implement what he calls a Òcivil rights priorityÓ without
alienating the men and women who serve honorably in our armed forces without
raising a rainbow flag in the morning and wearing our sexuality on our sleeves.
The
public should demand that the question concerning gays serving openly in the
military be asked and both candidates should be forced to tell.