The Murder of Nick
Berg
Commentary by Steve Yuhas
May 14, 2004
Pictures
of Iraqis who have American blood on their hands being humiliated at the hands
of their American guards all seem trivial now donÕt they?
After
the release of the murderous hacking off of the head of 26-year-old Nick Berg
of Pennsylvania I sit in amazement as people on the left and Democrats continue
the barrage of criticism against the President and the troops in Iraq.
Berg
was a civilian who went to Iraq on his own in order to help the people of Iraq
build for themselves a free and peaceful country. He wasnÕt a member of
the military nor was he a contractor hired by anyone, he was simply an American
who believed in the mission and went to Iraq to help.
He
was kidnapped by members of Al Qaeda (who Democrats still say have no
connection to Iraq before the war) and sat before a camera in an orange prison
jumpsuit forced to introduce himself and give a family tree. Shortly
after reading a rambling statement about Allah one of the masked men, who the
group claims to be Abu Musab al-Zarqawi (Osama bin LadenÕs man in Baghdad both
before the war and after) took out a long knife and began the egregious task of
beheading the young Jewish American.
A
statement released by the group echoes the criticism and becomes the
self-fulfilling prophecy that has headlined the mainstream media for the last
week. Senator Kennedy (D-MA) took to the floor of the United States
Senate following the release of humiliating pictures of Iraqi detainees declaring
that SaddamÕs torture chambers were re-opened by George Bush and under American
management.
Many
on the left, mainstream Democrats (including the presumptive Democratic nominee
John Kerry) and sadly some Republicans made similar comments and commentators
said that it would only be a matter of time before terrorists killed an
American and used the prison photos as motive.
Nowhere
in the zeal to paint American forces as evil torturers did the media help
provide a perspective necessary to adequately consider the pictures that were
taken at Abu Ghraib. It didnÕt matter that only a dozen or so of the
150,000 troops in Iraq were involved in the improper conduct Š the left had the
pictures they needed to damage the mission in Iraq, the President.
Then
came the video of an American being viciously murdered at the hands of Islamic
terrorists.
All
the words that were used to describe the humiliation of Iraqis were being used
again to describe the brutal murder of an American. Torture,
abhorrent, inhumane and indescribable were adjectives used by some on the left and in
the media interchangeably to describe the two sets of pictures. The
problem now is that weÕve elevated fraternity pranks and obscenity to torture
and now lack any words to accurately describe what happened to Nick Berg.
As
I watched the video of the 2nd Jewish American to be beheaded by
Islamic extremists I became sick to my stomach and was brought to tears.
I didnÕt know Berg and I knew that the video contained his death, but to see a
man thrown to the floor with his hands tied and to listen to his screams as he
was murdered by five men invoking Allah was more than I could bear.
Torture
and atrocity accurately describe what happened to Nick Berg, it doesnÕt come
close to describing what happened to a few Iraqis who shouldnÕt have been
forced to be naked, but who were able to walk away from the prison and whose
captors are being brought to justice by court martial.
As
the media works hard to make some moral equivalency between the humiliation of
Iraqi prisoners at the hands of a few soldiers to the beheading of an American
the rest of us can see the distinction between the two. The treatment of
Iraqi prisoners never stopped a radical Islamist from killing Americans before and
it was not the impetus now. They killed 3,000 of us on September 11th
and hundreds more in the decade before; to say now that the death of Nick Berg
is the result of a few soldiers acting out of anger or whatever their excuse is
to deny that Muslim terrorists have been after us for decades.
The
enemy we face in the world has made itself known in Iraq. The five masked
men who sadistically murdered an American represent the tens or hundreds of
thousands who want to do us harm in the Middle East or right here at
home. The man with the knife could have been any of the September 11th
hijackers who lived among us. Sadly, Nick Berg could have been any of us
as well.
It
is clear now as we juxtapose the pictures of Iraqi mistreatment at Abu Ghraib
next to the video and images of Nick Berg that any attempt by the left or
Democrats to paint American soldiers, sailors, airmen or Marines with the same
or similar brush as the Islamic killers is stretch of momentous
proportion. We are not like them, even at our worst at Abu Ghraib, and
the comparison is offensive and repulsive.
The
murder of Nick Berg was intended to make Americans demand the removal of our
forces from Iraq and to halt the war against terrorism. Little do the
Islamic terrorists know that when one of our own is murdered in the name of
their God that the American people rally around our President, our flag and our
ideals of freedom and liberty.
America
is not Spain and the lessons learned from the past by terrorists should be the
waking of a sleeping giant that we were in World War II instead of the pacifist
reaction that the people of Spain had after the killing of 200 of their people
in March.
The
five masked Muslims who killed Nick Berg may have been the needed awakening
after weÕve hit the snooze bar of normalcy so long after 9-11.