Pat Tillman Proves
That a Draft is Unnecessary
Commentary by Steve Yuhas
April 29, 2004
U.S.
Representative Charlie Rangel has been calling on the government to reinstate
the military draft because he believes that poor and minority men and women are
more apt to join the military than the children of privileged white
families. Fine and good, but Rangel is often on the losing side of
arguments and it is easy to dismiss his race bating rhetoric out of hand as the
words of someone beholden to a district of exactly the people he
describes. When Senator Chuck Hagel of Nebraska talks about reinstating
the draft, the talk turns from words of a fringe lonely Congressman to
something more mainstream.
It
has been a generation since the United States conscripted men to serve in our
military. Some would say that the all-volunteer nature of our current
military make-up has made the U.S. military the most powerful and professional
in the world. It is, after all, easier to train men for the rigors of war
when they want to be there than it is to train men who have contempt for the
organization. Others argue that the military is little more than a
dumping ground for people who have no other option in life other than going to
the military to earn money for college or to get out of the ghetto.
How
insulting.
The
death today of former NFL up and comer Pat Tillman while serving with the Army
Rangers in Afghanistan is just one example of many of why the United States
need not conscript men to fight in our military. Tillman walked away from
a multi-million dollar contract with the Arizona Cardinals after the September
11th terrorist attacks just weeks after marrying his new wife and
with his brother, joined the army. So strong was his desire to fight for
his country that with the militaryÕs age restriction creeping up on the 25 year
old he opted to leave his career and family and sacrifice for the rest of us.
Pat
Tillman is not alone in that sacrifice.
Men
and women all around the country struggle with the sacrifice that is military
service. Most are anonymous, but most of them leave behind a potential
new career, family and friends. They are called to serve for the same
reasons that prompted Tillman and although their financial situations may
differ it is the fortune in their hearts that pull so many toward fighting for
our country instead of earning for themselves and their families. Tillman
represents the sacrifice by every man and woman who serve in uniform today, but
what is different is that so many are noticing his sacrifice.
Every
flag draped coffin that returns from overseas contains an American who
volunteered his or her life to protect America. TillmanÕs death, although
playing different on the media today, will return just like all the other
coffins. His flag draped coffin will be proudly returned next to the
coffin of an anonymous man or woman that Charlie Rangel represents. His
coffin will be honored by soldiers from HagelÕs home state of Nebraska and will
be saluted by men and women at his funeral from all walks of life, all kinds of
backgrounds and all races and creeds. The death of Tillman will be
mourned by his brothers in arms Š a mourning that people like Rangel and Hagel
simply cannot understand.
The
need for the draft is unnecessary because people like Tillman and people
completely unlike him volunteer to serve our nation. Nobody joins the
military for all the same reasons, but one thing is certain Š there are a whole
lot of other options out there for 18 year olds and choosing the military when
billions of dollars are spent each year for college level financial aid dispels
the myth that people are only joining to earn college money. There may
have been a time when college money was hard to come by, but all one needs to
do now is apply for it and you can attend any state university for pennies on
the dollar.
The
military is a sacrifice and calling that people from all walks of life answer
and to draft men and women into it would be to relegate the sacrifice to little
more than a social experiment to pay back rich white families for the
bitterness felt by some politicians. The difference between a military of
conscripts and a military of volunteers would be the loss of pride that the men
and women who serve today feel for their service.
The
gratitude and thanks we all feel for our military is so heartfelt because we
know these people volunteer to do what they do. To conscript others into
that service would lessen the sacrifice and there is something uniquely
American about the anonymity of those coffins returning from overseas. We
donÕt know who they are, but we are keenly aware of what they did.
Talk
of reinstating the draft should be put to bed tonight when we remember those
serving our nation in our prayers. If a politician today feels guilt for
the make-up of our military, they need to displace that guilt by not
badmouthing the people who serve and to support them with all the money our
nation's treasure has to provide them the pay and benefits they deserve.
Until they do that they should stop worrying about forcing people into the
military. The beauty of America is that we seem to be turning out a
generation of men and women who understand what it is to be an American and the
beauty of freedom.
It
is too bad so many Baby Boomers don't get it.